<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CineVegas Reviews #1</title>
	<link>http://glitterfish.com/2006/06/16/cinevegas-reviews-1/</link>
	<description>my blog, that's it.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: glitterfish.com &#187; Interview with Festival Programmer Mike Plante</title>
		<link>http://glitterfish.com/2006/06/16/cinevegas-reviews-1/#comment-29</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://glitterfish.com/2006/06/16/cinevegas-reviews-1/#comment-29</guid>
					<description>[...] I want to thank Mike for answering our questions and also for putting on such a great festival. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I want to thank Mike for answering our questions and also for putting on such a great festival. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: glitterfish.com &#187; CineVegas Recap</title>
		<link>http://glitterfish.com/2006/06/16/cinevegas-reviews-1/#comment-21</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://glitterfish.com/2006/06/16/cinevegas-reviews-1/#comment-21</guid>
					<description>[...] As far as the films go they all screened at the Brenden Theater at the Palms. The first show we saw was the Shorts Program #1. I was really impressed and a little intimated by how good the films were. I could be nit picky (a lot of the films ran a little long) but the fact was they were all well done and entertaining. Interestingly enough, and something that should be encouraging to poor young filmmakers, between the four of us our two favorites also featured the lowest production value. The best short was What the Captive Ate (dir. Matt Lemche), a hilarious video diary about an image-conscious man trapped in his bedroom when his roommate’s guests stay longer than expected. Our other favorite was The Smoking Section directed by Chris Pozzebon). We also saw Shorts Program #2 and you can read Nate’s review of that here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] As far as the films go they all screened at the Brenden Theater at the Palms. The first show we saw was the Shorts Program #1. I was really impressed and a little intimated by how good the films were. I could be nit picky (a lot of the films ran a little long) but the fact was they were all well done and entertaining. Interestingly enough, and something that should be encouraging to poor young filmmakers, between the four of us our two favorites also featured the lowest production value. The best short was What the Captive Ate (dir. Matt Lemche), a hilarious video diary about an image-conscious man trapped in his bedroom when his roommate’s guests stay longer than expected. Our other favorite was The Smoking Section directed by Chris Pozzebon). We also saw Shorts Program #2 and you can read Nate’s review of that here. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: glitterfish.com &#187; CineVegas Festival Winners Announced</title>
		<link>http://glitterfish.com/2006/06/16/cinevegas-reviews-1/#comment-19</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://glitterfish.com/2006/06/16/cinevegas-reviews-1/#comment-19</guid>
					<description>[...] RELATED: CineVegas Recap, CineVegas Reviews #1. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] RELATED: CineVegas Recap, CineVegas Reviews #1. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: glitterfish.com &#187; CineVegas Report</title>
		<link>http://glitterfish.com/2006/06/16/cinevegas-reviews-1/#comment-14</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 03:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://glitterfish.com/2006/06/16/cinevegas-reviews-1/#comment-14</guid>
					<description>[...] As far as the films go they all screened at the Brenden Theater at the Palms. The first show we saw was the Shorts Program #1. I was really impressed and a little intimated by how good the films were. I could be nit picky (a lot of the films ran a little long) but the fact was they were all well done and entertaining. Interestingly enough, and something that should be encouraging to poor young filmmakers, between the four of us our two favorites also featured the lowest production value. The best short was What the Captive Ate (dir. Matt Lemche), a hilarious video diary about an image-conscious man trapped in his bedroom when his roommate’s guests stay longer than expected. Our other favorite was The Smoking Section directed by Chris Pozzebon). We also saw Shorts Program #2 and you can read Nate’s review of that here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] As far as the films go they all screened at the Brenden Theater at the Palms. The first show we saw was the Shorts Program #1. I was really impressed and a little intimated by how good the films were. I could be nit picky (a lot of the films ran a little long) but the fact was they were all well done and entertaining. Interestingly enough, and something that should be encouraging to poor young filmmakers, between the four of us our two favorites also featured the lowest production value. The best short was What the Captive Ate (dir. Matt Lemche), a hilarious video diary about an image-conscious man trapped in his bedroom when his roommate’s guests stay longer than expected. Our other favorite was The Smoking Section directed by Chris Pozzebon). We also saw Shorts Program #2 and you can read Nate’s review of that here. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
